English
English
Español
Français

User Access


CCS-OpenForBusiness-Sidebar
NFBA - Sidebar Ad - Accredited Builder
Elevate - Sidebar Ad - Nobody covers you better
Cotney Consulting Group - Affinity Webinar - Associations - Sidebar - On Demand
TRA-VideoBrochure-Sidebar
CCS-OpenForBusiness-Sidebar
ABC Supply - Sidebar Ad - Take Control of Your Work Day
English
English
Español
Français

New Roof Pics

« Back To Roofers Talk
Author
Posts
November 20, 2009 at 6:04 p.m.

tinner666

I just update/d a new page on my site. I didn't use all the pics, but figured I'd put the page up anyway.

http://www.albertsroofing.com/New%20Slate%20Roof.htm

November 23, 2009 at 7:25 a.m.

copperman

One problem I see with doing slate on roofs like this is the painters just walk all over it and bust the slate all up. Anytime a shed roof butts up to an area that needs routine maintenance I always see damage from people walking on them.

November 22, 2009 at 12:37 p.m.

tinner666

wywoody Said: With the thickness of tile, the actual pitch of the tile surface is 1/12 less than the roof pitch at normal headlap. When you start adding more headlap, the pitch of the tile surface drops quickly. Ive seen installations where someone thought they were making a better roof with extra headlap on a lower pitch and instead had the tile butts floating because the tile pivoted where it overlapped the tile below. With slate, it looks like extra lap makes the top float instead. Is there any chance a snowload might push the top down and pivot up the butts?

No. 4" isn't really extra for slate headlap. 3" is normal, though very few are done that way. My slates won't rock. They are nested fro best fit.

November 21, 2009 at 7:30 a.m.

tinner666

I tried to convince them to go with metal. No go! :huh: But, I ddi my best and I think it'll be OK. The fir won't rot. The layers I installed will help. The 4" lap almost created a double layer.

Yes Mike, 1-1/4".

November 21, 2009 at 6:13 a.m.

copperman

A nice standing seam tin roof would be historically correct also. I hate those historical society people who think they know best. I had to do the same a few years ago on a state run project. they had me install wood shingles on a 3 pitch in a heavy snow area. Was not allowed to use ant paper or ice & water shield or pressured treated shingles. First winter they had 20 inches of wet snow and it laid on the roof for weeks. It leaked through(duh)everywhere. They came after me for replacement. I had them,before I started the roof sign off on going against manufactures recommendations.That saved me. I did go and shovel it off and the leaks stopped of coarse. It never leaked in the rain, only when snow laid on it for long periods of time. They had to re-build the whole structure prior to my roofing it because it had all rotted away because it had the wrong kind of roof on it. Go figure.

November 20, 2009 at 8:43 p.m.

tinner666

Yup. But the first one, with 15# paper and 2" headlap made it for 65 years. This will go farther. It's in a historic area and supposed to look original. Which had 8x12 and 5" exposure, 2" headlap. Because of the holes, I went 6" with 4" headlap. And I did cull the crossgrained slate. With the copper nails, I bet it last 100 years this time.

The other bidders said the I&W made headlap unnecessary and were going to install 6x11's. 5" exposure. :woohoo: The style is the norm for the area.

November 20, 2009 at 7:08 p.m.

copperman

Way to flat for slate. All they got is a tar paper roof that looks like slate.


« Back To Roofers Talk
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

MBCI - Banner - Quote Order Build
English
English
Español
Français

User Access


CCS-OpenForBusiness-Sidebar
Ingage Ski Chalet 2025 register
CCS-OpenForBusiness-Sidebar
Service First Solutions -Haz crecer tu servicio de techado- sidebear
DaVinci - Sidebar Ad - May 2024 Unmatched, Unlimited, Uncompromising
Pli-Dek - Sidebar - Only the Best - June
SRS - Sidebar Ad - SRS Para Latinos